A practical software comparison
FloodEx and magicplan: where each fits.
Compare floor-plan-led documentation with FloodEx’s job-based restoration record before choosing a field reporting workflow.
What magicplan offers
magicplan’s reporting product combines floor plans, photographs, moisture readings, equipment logs and custom forms, with PDF and link sharing. Its documentation features overlap with restoration reporting requirements.
Which workflow are you buying for?
Include magicplan when floor-plan capture and customised report forms are a priority. Include FloodEx when your priority is a connected job history of photos, readings and notes with a straightforward report-unlock model.
A practical evaluation
Use a job with several rooms and at least two visits. Check how quickly a technician can locate a previous observation and how clearly each report explains the change. If dimensioned plans are essential, test that output directly.
Compare pricing on the same basis
Free job capture. First eligible job unlock free per company. Then A$29 per job, or A$250/month for company Unlimited. A per-job unlock includes 28 days of editing and continued re-downloads. Check magicplan’s current package, currency, users and add-ons directly; this page does not assert a price advantage or feature absence.
Sources and comparison notes
Vendor information checked on 18 September 2026. Features, availability and packages can change. This comparison is written by FloodEx; it is not a vendor endorsement or an independent benchmark.
The details
Common questions
Is FloodEx a like-for-like replacement for magicplan?
Not necessarily. Match your required outputs, integrations, permissions and field workflow before switching. This is a FloodEx-authored comparison based on the linked vendor information, not an independent benchmark.
Start with one job
See how your field record comes together.
Free capture. First eligible job unlock free per company.